Mike Connor talks about the diminishing amount of time he can dedicate to reviewing Firefox patches. The thing is, this isn’t a new problem. I’m not bashing Mike at all, far from it. There have always been more patches than reviewers can handle, and some folks have noticed there’s the occasional reviewer MIA. Maybe an idea between more reviewers (of limited possibility considering the depth of knowledge about the codebase required) and long lines would be a sort of patch pre-reviewer, or editor. A person or group who are dedicated to one module, who can give a cursory review of a patch to fix obvious mistakes like typos, pointers to hyperspace, etc., and then if a patch passes their muster it can be put into the queue for the module owner. This would cut down on the number of rookie level errors and worthless patches the busy guys need to look over. Something like teacher assistants in college. Something to think about I guess…
One thought on “On The Firefox Review Deficit”
Comments are closed.
Related Posts
Ads for sale! Get ’em while they’re hot!
- Grey
- September 22, 2005
- 1 min read
- 1
[ music | Simon and Garfunkel – Keep The Customer Satisfied ] As you may be able to see to […]
Bonsai Watch
- Grey
- January 28, 2007
- 1 min read
- 3
[ music | Always Look On The Bright Side Of Life – Monty Python ] Oh crap. Actually, someone informed […]
Bugzilla email address changed!
- Grey
- March 14, 2005
- 1 min read
- 0
I have changed my email address in Bugzilla. For several years it’s been my MozillaNews.org address, with my handle of […]
The Logo, Transmogrified
- Grey
- September 22, 2004
- 1 min read
- 6
Well. It seems I’ve had my first official trademark infringement letter! Gerv mailed me and said if I didn’t change […]
How about using some existing mailing list? An authoratitive reviewer could use mailing list messages from trusted prereviewers as his prereview process. The authoratitive reviewer would probably need a T-bird mail filter or similar to look for the "nominations".