<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Safari for Windows&#8230; ?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://burntelectrons.org/2007/06/safari-for-windows/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://burntelectrons.org/2007/06/safari-for-windows/</link>
	<description>and other random particles...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2012 00:00:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: argh, my eyes!</title>
		<link>http://burntelectrons.org/2007/06/safari-for-windows/comment-page-1/#comment-963</link>
		<dc:creator>argh, my eyes!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2007 06:16:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-963</guid>
		<description>Ok, so some people like fuzzy, pretty text, other people like readable text and using an LCD without getting a headache. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Apple, please, FFS give us the option to disable the fuzzy font nightmare!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok, so some people like fuzzy, pretty text, other people like readable text and using an LCD without getting a headache. </p>
<p>Apple, please, FFS give us the option to disable the fuzzy font nightmare!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jon Morin</title>
		<link>http://burntelectrons.org/2007/06/safari-for-windows/comment-page-1/#comment-907</link>
		<dc:creator>jon Morin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2007 06:35:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-907</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t see how you can compare those screenshots in the post and honestly say that Firefox looks better. I guess like most things, even text appearance is completely subjective....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t see how you can compare those screenshots in the post and honestly say that Firefox looks better. I guess like most things, even text appearance is completely subjective&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martijn</title>
		<link>http://burntelectrons.org/2007/06/safari-for-windows/comment-page-1/#comment-879</link>
		<dc:creator>Martijn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2007 14:17:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-879</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t like font smoothing at all and always turn it off.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t like font smoothing at all and always turn it off.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Walden</title>
		<link>http://burntelectrons.org/2007/06/safari-for-windows/comment-page-1/#comment-877</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Walden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2007 00:20:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-877</guid>
		<description>I agree with others -- the fonts are blurry and suck to read.  Various sites claim this to be a Microsoft-Apple split over readability versus faithfulness to the typographer&#039;s intentions, and honestly, I couldn&#039;t care less what the typographer thought when he made his oh-so-beautiful printable font -- I want to be able to read it on a screen, since that&#039;s where I&#039;ll see it most.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with others &#8212; the fonts are blurry and suck to read.  Various sites claim this to be a Microsoft-Apple split over readability versus faithfulness to the typographer&#8217;s intentions, and honestly, I couldn&#8217;t care less what the typographer thought when he made his oh-so-beautiful printable font &#8212; I want to be able to read it on a screen, since that&#8217;s where I&#8217;ll see it most.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Benjamin Frisch</title>
		<link>http://burntelectrons.org/2007/06/safari-for-windows/comment-page-1/#comment-876</link>
		<dc:creator>Benjamin Frisch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 21:44:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-876</guid>
		<description>1. Did you know WebKit, Safari&#039;s backend, even the Windows version, is opensource? (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.webkit.org&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.webkit.org&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.joelonsoftware.com/items/2007/06/12.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.joelonsoftware.c...&lt;/a&gt; pretty much explains the whole font smoothing issue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1. Did you know WebKit, Safari&#8217;s backend, even the Windows version, is opensource? (<a href="http://www.webkit.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.webkit.org</a>)</p>
<p>2. <a href="http://www.joelonsoftware.com/items/2007/06/12.html" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://www.joelonsoftware.c" rel="nofollow">http://www.joelonsoftware.c</a>&#8230; pretty much explains the whole font smoothing issue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://burntelectrons.org/2007/06/safari-for-windows/comment-page-1/#comment-875</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 12:46:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-875</guid>
		<description>Grey, have you tried the ClearType tuning PowerToy?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.microsoft.com/typography/ClearTypePowerToy.mspx&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.microsoft.com/ty...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Grey, have you tried the ClearType tuning PowerToy?</p>
<p><a href="http://www.microsoft.com/typography/ClearTypePowerToy.mspx" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://www.microsoft.com/ty" rel="nofollow">http://www.microsoft.com/ty</a>&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hansen</title>
		<link>http://burntelectrons.org/2007/06/safari-for-windows/comment-page-1/#comment-874</link>
		<dc:creator>hansen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 09:47:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-874</guid>
		<description>I gotta agree with JD.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From where I&#039;m sitting, Firefox is way smoother than Safari. (IBM X31 default resolution)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I gotta agree with JD.</p>
<p>From where I&#8217;m sitting, Firefox is way smoother than Safari. (IBM X31 default resolution)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JD</title>
		<link>http://burntelectrons.org/2007/06/safari-for-windows/comment-page-1/#comment-873</link>
		<dc:creator>JD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 02:57:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-873</guid>
		<description>You gotta be high or blind because Safari&#039;s font smoothing is terrible. It ruins the look of web pages and Firefox + cleartype is way better and much easier on the eyes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You gotta be high or blind because Safari&#8217;s font smoothing is terrible. It ruins the look of web pages and Firefox + cleartype is way better and much easier on the eyes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stig</title>
		<link>http://burntelectrons.org/2007/06/safari-for-windows/comment-page-1/#comment-872</link>
		<dc:creator>Stig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 02:16:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-872</guid>
		<description>Does anyone know how much code is shared between Windows and Mac versions? Can you assume Mac and Windows versions works and renders the same way on 99% of all webpages?&lt;br /&gt;
Of course I&#039;m asking because I wanna know if a Windows-version is a reliable test-app for Safari/Mac compatibility of webpages.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does anyone know how much code is shared between Windows and Mac versions? Can you assume Mac and Windows versions works and renders the same way on 99% of all webpages?<br />
Of course I&#8217;m asking because I wanna know if a Windows-version is a reliable test-app for Safari/Mac compatibility of webpages.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Lefevre</title>
		<link>http://burntelectrons.org/2007/06/safari-for-windows/comment-page-1/#comment-871</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Lefevre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 01:39:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-871</guid>
		<description>Just reading through all the blogs this morning, and first I saw a couple of people saying &quot;wow, this smoothing is great, Firefox needs to copy this&quot;, and then I see people saying &lt;a href=&quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.codinghorror.com/blog/archives/000884.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.codinghorror.com...&lt;/a&gt;&quot;&gt;&quot;Safari&#039;s fonts are all messed up&quot;&lt;/a&gt; (the comments there have some argument about this issue).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just reading through all the blogs this morning, and first I saw a couple of people saying &quot;wow, this smoothing is great, Firefox needs to copy this&quot;, and then I see people saying &lt;a href=&quot;<a href="http://www.codinghorror.com/blog/archives/000884.html" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://www.codinghorror.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.codinghorror.com</a>&#8230;&quot;&gt;&quot;Safari&#8217;s fonts are all messed up&quot;&lt;/a&gt; (the comments there have some argument about this issue).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

